Global Talent Visa guide

Global Talent peer review recommendation letters: who writes them and what they must say

Global Talent peer review recommendation letters for the Royal Society, RAEng and British Academy: who can write them, what to include and the format.

Quick answer

A Global Talent peer review recommendation letter must be written for this application by an eminent person with internationally recognised expertise in your field. Exceptional Promise needs one letter, from someone resident in the UK who knows your work. Exceptional Talent needs a second letter from a different person who is a senior member of a reputable UK organisation in your field and gives an objective assessment.

If you work outside the UK, your first letter must still come from someone resident in the UK, while the second author is judged by their senior role in a UK organisation, so start finding UK-based referees early.

Global Talent peer review recommendation letters: who writes them and what they must say

Who this guide helps

  • Researchers applying through peer review without a fast-track route
  • Applicants deciding between Exceptional Talent and Exceptional Promise
  • Scientists, engineers and humanities researchers choosing referees
  • Senior academics asked to write a letter

What you will know

  • Promise needs one letter. Talent needs two, from two different people.
  • The first author must be resident in the UK and know your work.
  • The second author must be a senior member of a reputable UK organisation in your field.
  • Each letter is up to three sides of A4, signed, dated, on headed paper, with the author's CV.
  • General references and employment contracts are not accepted.
Primary official source for this article. Royal Society Route 4: Peer review

Part 1 · How many

Exceptional Promise needs one letter, Exceptional Talent needs two

These rules are the same for the Royal Society, the Royal Academy of Engineering and the British Academy. Every peer review applicant needs a letter of personal recommendation. Exceptional Talent applicants also need a second letter giving an objective assessment of their reputation in the field. The two letters must be written by different people.

  • Exceptional Promise: one letter of personal recommendation
  • Exceptional Talent: the letter of personal recommendation plus an objective assessment letter
  • Each letter must come with the author's CV
Read the official guidanceBack to contents

Part 2 · Who can write

Who can write each letter?

The first author must be an eminent person resident in the UK, with internationally recognised expertise in your field, who knows you and your work. The second author must be a senior member of a reputable UK organisation concerned with research or innovation in your field. They do not need to know you personally, and the published rules set no residence requirement for them. Examples of senior roles include Professor, Head of Department, Chief Executive, Vice-Chancellor or Pro Vice-Chancellor.

  • Letter 1: resident in the UK, familiar with your work, qualified to judge your claim
  • Letter 2: senior member of a reputable UK organisation in your field
  • Letter 2: an expert able to assess your work independently
  • The more senior and eminent the author is in your field, the stronger the letter
Read the official guidanceBack to contents

Part 3 · What to include

What reviewers need to read in each letter

Each letter must be written for your Global Talent application. A letter written for another reason cannot be used. Ask authors to be as detailed as possible, because the strength of the letters is one of the factors reviewers assess. A line such as "she led the first field trial of this sensor across three hospitals" helps more than "she is an excellent scientist".

  • Letter 1: how the author knows you and your achievements in the field
  • Letter 1: why they think you show exceptional talent or promise
  • Letter 1: how you would benefit from the UK and contribute to UK research or innovation and wider society
  • Letter 2: a statement that the author is a senior member of a reputable UK organisation in your field
  • Letter 2: why your work shows exceptional talent and how you would contribute to the UK
  • Letter 2: a statement that this is an objective assessment, despite any personal knowledge of you
Read the official guidanceBack to contents

Part 4 · Format

Each letter must meet the same format rules

Format errors are easy to avoid and should never be the reason for a delay. The endorsing bodies can refuse an application, or ask for more information, if there is no evidence that a letter's author is a credible referee. The author's CV is that evidence, so do not leave it out.

  • Typed, signed and dated
  • On headed paper, and for the first letter the organisation's logo and registered address, if applicable
  • Up to three sides of A4, not counting the author's credentials and contact details
  • The author's email address and direct telephone number
  • The author's CV, or other proof of credentials the endorsing body accepts
Read the official guidanceBack to contents

Part 5 · Common mistakes

The mistakes that weaken or stall an application

Most letter problems come from reusing something that already exists. Reviewers need statements written for this purpose, by authors whose standing is clear from their CV.

  • Sending a general reference letter
  • Sending an employment contract instead of a letter
  • Reusing a letter written for a job, grant or award
  • Asking a first author who does not live in the UK
  • Using the same person for both letters
  • Leaving out the objective assessment statement in the second letter
Read the official guidanceBack to contents

Part 6 · Briefing and timing

Brief each author early and give them what they need

Senior authors are busy, so plan the letters before anything else in the application. Give each author a short brief that lists the points their letter must cover, your CV and the facts they can confirm. Check every returned letter against the content and format rules before you submit. Peer review endorsement applications usually take 5 weeks, so build that in after the letters are ready.

  • Choose your category first, because it decides how many letters you need
  • Send each author the list of required points for their letter
  • Share your CV and two or three concrete achievements they can confirm
  • Agree a date for the signed letter and the author's CV
  • Check page length, signature, date and contact details on arrival
Read the official guidanceBack to contents

Related guides

Keep reading

Guides applicants usually read next on this topic.

Article FAQ

Questions to settle before you spend time or money.

Use these answers to check the practical risks, documents, and decisions connected to this topic.

Does my referee have to live in the UK?

Yes, for the letter of personal recommendation. The second letter, needed only for Exceptional Talent, must come from a senior member of a reputable UK organisation in your field.

Can my PhD supervisor or a co-author write the second letter?

Yes, the second author can know you. The letter must state that it is an objective assessment, despite any personal knowledge or involvement in your work.

Can I reuse a reference written for a job application?

No. Each letter must be written for your Global Talent application, and general reference letters are not accepted.

How long can a letter be?

Up to three sides of A4. The author's credentials and contact details do not count towards that limit.

Do I need to send the author's CV?

Yes. Each letter should come with the author's CV, or other proof of their credentials that the endorsing body accepts.

Letters plan

Want help choosing and briefing your referees?

We help you decide between Talent and Promise, identify suitable authors and brief them so each letter covers every required point.

Book a free 30-minute callCheck eligibilityMore guides