1. Home
  2. Guides

Which research endorsing body covers you, and which route?

Find out how the Royal Society, Royal Academy of Engineering, British Academy and UKRI compare, and when the UKRI endorsed funder route applies instead of peer review.

By Mihir Thaker, Founder · Updated 8 October 2026 · 5 min read

Start here

Your discipline, not your job title, decides the endorsing body

Each endorsing body covers a published list of disciplines. Check your sub-discipline on that list before anything else. If your work is non-academic digital technology or arts and culture, it goes to Tech Nation or Arts Council England instead.

Royal Society
natural and medical sciences, including maths, physics, biology, and computer science.
Royal Academy of Engineering
engineering, including computing, AI, data science and software engineering.
British Academy
humanities and social sciences, such as economics, law, history and politics.
UKRI
any discipline, but only through the endorsed funder route.
See the published disciplines list

Side by side

How do the four endorsing bodies compare?

The three academies use identical routes, letter rules and timings. UKRI is different: it checks your grant and your host, not your career as a whole.

Routes
the three academies run appointments, fellowships and peer review; UKRI runs the endorsed funder route.
Categories
Talent or Promise on peer review and fellowships; not used on the UKRI route.
Letters
one for Promise and two for Talent on peer review; an HR letter on the UKRI route.
PhD
needed on peer review (or equivalent); on the UKRI route only if you lead the research.
Decisions
peer review usually about five weeks; fast track, including UKRI, usually within 14 working days.
Read the official guidance

Overlaps

What if your field sits on more than one list?

The lists overlap. Computer science, AI and machine learning appear under both the Royal Society and the Royal Academy of Engineering, and so do parts of engineering. Psychology is split: experimental psychology sits with the Royal Society, social psychology with the British Academy.

  • Find your exact sub-discipline, not just the broad heading.
  • Choose the endorsing body whose list best describes your research, and say so in your application.
See the published disciplines list

Reading the rules is one thing. Knowing how they apply to your own evidence is another.

Book a free 30-minute call

Choosing a route

Three fast-track routes and one peer review route

Check the fast-track routes first, as they rely on something you already have. If none fits, peer review is open to you with or without a job offer.

Appointments
an accepted post at an approved UK institution, where the job requires a PhD or equivalent as essential.
Fellowships
a named fellowship held now or within the last five years.
Endorsed funders (UKRI)
you or your role named on a qualifying grant.
Peer review
experts judge your record as a leader (Talent) or potential leader (Promise).
Read the official guidance

UKRI route

When does the UKRI endorsed funder route apply?

It applies if you are, or will be, working on a grant from UKRI or another endorsed funder, and you or your role was named on the grant application. If you contribute to the research rather than lead it, you can instead have been appointed through a fair recruitment process; project leads must be listed on the grant. Your UK employer or host must be on the UKRI-approved list, although you can do the research abroad. You must also be an active researcher.

  • The grant is worth at least £30,000.
  • It covers at least two years.
  • You spend at least half your time on it.
  • Your UK host is approved by UKRI.
  • At least one year is left on your contract or hosting agreement.
Read the official guidance

Letters

Letters differ between peer review and UKRI

On peer review, Promise needs a letter from an eminent person resident in the UK, and Talent adds a second letter from a senior member of a reputable UK organisation in your field. Each letter must be written for this application and come with the author's CV. The UKRI route uses no recommendation letters; instead, the director of human resources at your UK organisation confirms your role, that you are essential to the grant and your time on it.

Read the official guidance

Before you apply

What the endorsing bodies will not do

The endorsing bodies do not give advice to individual applicants and do not review documents before you submit. Peer review is judged only on the evidence you send. If you are refused, a review can check whether evidence was properly considered, but you cannot add new evidence.

  • Get the route and endorsing body right before you submit.
  • Brief your letter authors or HR team early.
  • Stage 2 is a separate application to the Home Office after endorsement.
Read the official guidance

Related guides

Keep reading

Guides applicants usually read next on this topic.

Applying from outside the UK. If you are applying from outside the UK, peer review is open without a job offer, but the endorsed funder route needs a UK host approved by UKRI, although the research itself can take place abroad.

Article FAQ

Questions to settle before you spend time or money.

Use these answers to check the practical risks, documents, and decisions connected to this topic.

Can I choose any of the three academies?

No. You apply to the endorsing body whose published discipline list covers your research.

Does UKRI peer review my career?

No. UKRI checks your grant, your role on it and your UK host; peer review is done by the Royal Society, Royal Academy of Engineering or British Academy.

Do I need a PhD for the UKRI route?

Only if you lead the research or project. If you contribute to research, a UK bachelor's degree, an equivalent overseas research degree or equivalent research experience can be enough.

Do I need a UK job offer to be endorsed?

Not for peer review or the fellowships route. The appointments route needs an accepted UK post, and the UKRI route needs a UKRI-approved UK employer or host.

Is the decision faster on fast track?

Usually, yes. Fast-track routes usually get a decision within 14 working days, while peer review usually takes about five weeks.

Researchers

Not sure which endorsing body or route is yours?

On a free call we can check your discipline against the published lists and talk through which route fits your record, grant or post.